Babylonians used fingerprints as their signature on clay tablets.
220
When the Chinese first started to use ink prints, fingerprints soon became forgotten
1686
Malpighius started to describe fingerprints, but stopped after portraying their ridges
1823
J.E. Purkynie discovered the possibility to classify fingerprints
1874
Henry Faulds, “The Father of Fingerprinting,” kept records of fingerprints and concluded that fingerprint patterns were unchangeable and that visible fingerprints could best be left with printer's ink on a smooth board. He received credit for the first identification of a fingerprint as he proved to be able to lift a fingerprint from a bottle of whiskey.
1858
Sir William Herschel insisted that workers sign contracts with fingerprints, in India, as he wanted to make sure they got their legitimate pensions; this became the first documentation application of fingerprints
1877
Sir William Herschel first suggested taking and storing the fingerprints of prisoners
1880
Doctor Henry Faulds published British literature on the use of fingerprinting
1882
Gilbert Thompson used thumbprints on checks to avoid fraud in the USA.
1882
The first evidence of the use of fingerprints in the United States was by New Mexico surveyor Gilbert Thompson who purposely covered his survey with his prints in order prevent forgery
1888
Sir Francis Galton developed fingerprint classification so that they could be identified and retrieved in a reasonable amount of time
1892
The first recorded use of fingerprint identification in a criminal matter was when Argentinean Police Commodore Juan Vucetich took prints off a door post to find a murderer.
by Sir Edward Richard Henry identified and classified the four basic patterns of fingerprints: the arch, the loop, the whorls, and the composites.
1924
Congress allowed the Federal Bureau of Investigation (F.B.I.) to establish an Identification Division. This combined all fingerprinting files which made it much easier to identify a certain set in the database, which today is completely computerized.
You may want to change the text color in this post because the text and the background are both very dark. The information in the time line is very good and covers the important events in the history of fingerprints.
ReplyDeleteCheck your spelling, but other than that the post is very informative and the pictures complement your text nicely
ReplyDeleteNice arrangement, but maybe add a little more? I see some holes
ReplyDelete